|
Post by danni on Dec 19, 2006 22:39:47 GMT -5
Yeah, I don't think rearviews are ears. I was just... well, I interpreted the RP as saying that they were ears. My mistake. I think the front windows are ears now. Nah, RPs are just that, RPs. They don't reflect what's true and not true in the movies. That's what makes RPing with a large group so difficult, not everyone is going to agree on how things in the world should work. That's why I only do one on one roleplaying.
|
|
|
Post by Razor Azura on Dec 19, 2006 23:44:59 GMT -5
We also have to state the point that cars AINT humans, they really don't have a different function similar to every body part to a human.
I believe this was brought up as well in the "Blood" argument, that cars are not humans, therefore, really don't need blood. The only things that we had found close to blood was oil, but since cars drink that, t'would be similar to us drinkin' our own blood.
So in the latter fact, it's hard to assume that cars even have ears, yes they can hear, but maybe aint got nothin' to do with ears. The antennae argument is a good issue since cars do afterall pick up signals from them, but it's only an assumption.
It's kinda like another argument I've discussed with friends, Cars having children. If you notice in our world, Car don't start like miniature versions and then grow and in reality, Cars don't have the parts that humans do to "make" (persay) children.
Anyway, I'll stop bringin' more debates in this 'un XD.
Overall, it's just more plausible to think of cars as cars and not humans.
Sorry if I trigger an argument, just statin' my opinion.
|
|